The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. Stifle (talk) 12:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Article just needs additional content from WP:RS. If "members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city" (where "major" is left undefined) are notable under WP:POLITICIAN, then certainly the chief executive of countywide government ought to be as well. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 22:32, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - categories of politicians are notable because of their media profile. However, there is no free pass for chief execs of any organisation; they have to meet WP:BIO which the subject, as yet, doesn't. TerriersFan (talk) 22:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being a county executive or having an obituary in the NY Times are far from satisfying WP:POLITICIAN. Where is the substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources needed to satisfy WP:N? Edison2 (talk) 04:18, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as county executive of county with population of 200000. We routinely keep articles on mayors of cities of that size, and this is the equivalent position. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:35, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.