The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eerievale[edit]

Eerievale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As hinted in the article itself, Eerievale is only a homebrew video game, and one which has not even been completed yet. The article uses only the official website for the game as a source, indicating that no independent publications are even aware of the game's existence. Martin IIIa (talk) 18:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as it fails WP:GNG (no reliable third party sources [1]) and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 01:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no coverage from reliable publications; weak claim of importance. Marasmusine (talk) 10:05, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.