The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Clearly notable per WP:FOOTYN and historic AfD consensus. No need to keep this open for purely administrative reasons. Fenix down (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eirobaltija Riga[edit]

Eirobaltija Riga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:56, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Bharatiya29 11:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Bharatiya29 11:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep Club has played in both a national league (second division) and the national cup, meeting WP:FOOTYN. Article needs a lot of improvement, but that isn't a reason to delete. Number 57 12:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep Article clearly meets WP:FOOTYN - perhaps User:Edgars2007 should withdraw it. Nfitz (talk) 19:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.