The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dubstep. J04n(talk page) 17:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Electrostep[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have nominated this page for deletion as it is unsourced material which many readers will find controversial. There is a lot of disagreement regarding electronic dance genres, and it is best to wait for the term to become established over time than to create an unprofessional page. If you do manage to find suitable references, it would be a good idea to plan it out before creating a page, to ensure that it is formal and the information included is substantial. Thanks. DJUnBalanced (talk) 20:36, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. --JoelRussell - Talk Contribs 20:42, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Redirect To Dubstep, if anything. Doesn't seem to be widely used. Maybe a WP:HOAX? §FreeRangeFrog 21:08, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This AfD was not added to the AfD log when it was first nominated, I have added it to today's log. -- Patchy1 08:48, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dubstep. Not worth an article, but the term is used, so let's redirect somewhere useful to the reader. --Michig (talk) 15:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.