The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elhachem[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible COI and Manual of Style Issues TF ^{{ Contribs } { Edit Quest! }} 18:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While COI and badly written pieces can be fixed, this is not notable. I think it's just a common last name in Lebanon. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 19:36, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - as a history buff, I'm sympathetic. It could be a worthy article if it were sourced. But its not and is also poorly written. It is, in truth, the name of a family that once held regional power. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 02:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete -- This has the feel of a badly written family history tract. I would reconsider my position if the article was greatly improved, including references and links. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - Fails WP:V, and it's quite difficult to source because searches only seem to turn up people with that name. GAB^Hello! 21:34, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.