The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:35, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ellerslie United Methodist Church[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, only third-party sources cite it in lists of churches, nothing notable about this particular church — Frεcklεfσσt|Talk 15:10, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable church. Article appears to have been written to pay "props" to lots of folks and get their names on Wikipedia. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 15:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Typical local church, lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, thus failing WP:ORG. Edison (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A brief history and a list of pastors at the church does not constitute WP:ORG. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable church. St Anselm (talk) 11:12, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.