The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. If there are still any doubts, after going through the sources listed below, about the subject's notability, feel free to renominate it. (non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 01:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elwood Reid[edit]

Elwood Reid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this fella is notable. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR, and if it's even the same guy, WP:NCOLLATH. John from Idegon (talk) 07:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 08:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 08:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.
Nom and user who iVoted delete. Both of you need remedial lessons in how to run a google search. Editors who think I'm overreacting should click the toolbar. Sheeessh.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.