The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 05:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emich (disambiguation)[edit]

Emich (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to have been recreated following a WP:G14 CSD for unnecessary disambiguation pages. I'm unsure if the content has changed from its original incarnation, though the page seems to still meet G14 criteria; using AfD to avoid an edit/revert war here.

This page is linked only from Emich, which it links back to. Emich contains a link to the surname under See Also. I'm unclear if the "Emich" spelling for Eastern Michigan University merits mention, but if it does, it seems that it could also fit in the See Also of Emich and doesn't require this separate page. I propose merging any unique content on this page into Emich and deleting it. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 17:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep. A valid disambig page. Contains 4 entries. Please cite the policy which advices squeezing multiple same-name items in a "see also" elsewhere. I've heard only about policy about ref to a single extra item with the same name placed on top. Loew Galitz (talk) 17:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MB: Good catch. I did better search and see that the term "emich building/buildings" is not used at all. Loew Galitz (talk) 21:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:46, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.