The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tyrenius 16:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emilia Bajena[edit]

Emilia Bajena (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article had an expired prod with the concern "Having a single six-page article about oneself -- or perhaps just appearing within a single six-page article -- isn't a bad achievement for an eighteen-year-old but it hardly constitutes encyclopedic notability." However, the article was already prodded once and the prod was removed by the article author, so the article cannot be deleted that way. Procedural nomination, I abstain. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Well well, there was indeed an earlier prod. Delete, for the reason quoted by the (NB just procedural!) nominator. -- Hoary 09:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Hardly notable. Freshacconci 10:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. Hoary 09:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]
• Delete. Procedural - WP:NOTE applies.Pedro |  Chat  10:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.