The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Endast[edit]

Endast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indications of notability. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable unsigned band. Article is unsourced and amounts to little more than a fluff-laden promotional piece, and no third-party hits on Google. Fails WP:BAND. sixtynine ^{• spill it •} 15:56, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Temporary Keep Article is just a few days old. Ability to meet wp:notability looks like a possibility. Source-based notability appears the only possibility, right now has no sources suitable for that. North8000 (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. The exclaim.ca piece is good, and they seem to getting some attention, but not enough to meet notability yet. The usual caveats apply — frankie (talk) 17:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:09, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Weak delete - if we had other sources besides the exclaim source, I would say keep. The #6 place for iTunes Canada is impressive but insufficiently sourced. Moogwrench (talk) 06:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Has had a lot of work since this deletion nomination started. Discography and activity make this band notable. Snowman (talk) 09:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Discography and activity do not make any band notable. Independent coverage of the band and/or their albums and activity indicates notability. The coverage of Endast referenced in the article does not appear to rise above the independent blog level. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no charting; no playing to stadium crowds. fails WP:BAND Stuartyeates (talk) 08:16, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.