The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:02, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eneko Eizmendi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AfD'ed by own creator. Although subject fails WP:NFOOTY, it's not clear if he passes WP:GNG or not. MYS77 ^✉ 19:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete football players have to pass the notability guidelines for football players to justify having an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Possible keep? Found all these results from a Google quick search (please see here https://www.google.pt/search?q=eneko+eizmendi&oq=eneko+eizmendi&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2723j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8). --Quite A Character (talk) 01:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia, wikiscrapes, transfermarkt (non RS stat site), twitter, instagram, a couple of stat pages that show he fails NFOOTBaLL...how many pages in before I find something that indicates keep? ClubOranje^T 06:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the first page alone, a newspaper article (https://www.lavozdegalicia.es/noticia/pontevedra/2017/01/24/extremo-eneko-eizmendi-nuevo-jugador-pontevedra/00031485270824166813585.htm, reliable, La Voz de Galicia). Then, these three after I decided not to be so lazy and typed "Eneko Eizmendi+carrera(career in Spanish)" (http://www.mundodeportivo.com/guipuzcoa/20170113/413305754725/un-viaje-por-carreteras-secundarias.html, http://diariodepontevedra.galiciae.com/noticia/712397/cuestion-de-tiempo-y-punteria and http://www.farodevigo.es/deportes/pontevedra/2017/01/24/eneko-eizmendi-elegido-reforzar-equipo/1610645.html, the first, Mundo Deportivo, is quite reliable and details his career at great length). --Quite A Character (talk) 09:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why you quote the articles, or add references to the page, because when I click your google link I get: en.wiki, es.wiki, transfermarkt.co.uk, transfermarkt.de, twitter, soccerway, squawks, YouTube, instagram and yazda.org (a wiki-scrape). Google knows I'm not in Portugal and dishes me up what it thinks is more "relevant" to me. ClubOranje^T 10:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 11:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'll give it another week for more people to judge the sources that have been dug up.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 02:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I had a look to see if he might pass NFooty, but he seems to have only played non-league Spanish football. I am not sure the citation coverage is enough, it doesn't help that it's in Spanish on English wikipedia. This seems to fail GNG on English wiki to me. Govvy (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.