The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Crytek. Merge would be good, but is there anything to merge except that it was cancelled and some original research Black Kite 18:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Engalus[edit]

Non-notable computer game that was never competed. Chzz ► 19:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. There are a few Ghits, but as one would expect with a game that was never released, they have nothing substantial to say. JohnCD (talk) 20:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ - Even through the game is canceled it has even more reason to keep it. Plus it has very good source for example this and this --SkyWalker (talk) 03:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On Second thought Merge as per Marasu. --SkyWalker (talk) 03:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Crytek#Games developed. The Eurogamer source is good, but without multiple significant sources it's better off in broader article (per WP:N) Marasmusine (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Crytek#Games developed per Marasmusine. The article has been a stub for several years now, and I'd be surprised, especially considering the game is cancelled, to see it grow to a size where it can hold its own any time soon. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 15:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.