The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. TigerShark (talk) 20:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enrico Rocce Verilano[edit]

No indication that this person actually exists. The small number of Google hits outside of Wikipedia are probably just copied unchecked from here. Another article of the same author is currently up for deletion for the same reasons. --Latebird (talk) 09:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree, the little amount of Google hits does look like it's a nonexistant person, unless we can get some confirmable references. Arienh4^(Talk) 10:05, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Latebird (talk) 09:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This appears to confirm the stats listed in the article, but I have no idea of its reliability. No other Ghits that I can find for things like "Equinho Caen", which seems unusual for a supposed professional player..... ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article is a hoax. The reliable sources covering SM Caen (L'Equipe, Eufo, FIFA, UEFA, etc) make no reference to such a person existing or ever playing for the club. Jogurney (talk) 22:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - surely this search would come up with hits if this player actually were on the books of Caen, a Ligue 1/2 club. ugen64 (talk) 23:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. Giant Snowman 21:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No result in www.lfp.fr and CBF contract record. Matthew_hk t c 05:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless the slightest shred of evidence indicating this guy actually exists can be presented. Ford MF (talk) 17:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.