The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Nintendo DS accessories#Official accessories. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 03:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ensata[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software in Google, Google News, and Google Books. Joe Chill (talk) 23:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) MrKIA11 (talk) 14:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 14:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Note that this is about an official Nintendo DS emulator provided to developers in NDS development kits that's apparently also appeared on warez sites. In other words, purely internal software of interest to Nintendo developers, unlikely to appear in reliable non-Nintendo sources. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Nintendo DS accessories#Official accessories. This item is highly analogous to other developer tools that have been of interest to gamers like the Wide-Boy 64. Per WP:SELFPUB, there's no specific requirement that RSes can't originate from Nintendo. -Thibbs (talk) 12:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as suggested by Thibbs. Pcap ping 14:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I see no reason why valuable information should be deleted. Merge that shit. --Calvin (talk) 02:54, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.