The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:26, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Entichius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speeedy renomination following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entichius. The evidence seems clear that this "Entichius" never existed, and that he is an attempt by some scholars to "fill the gap" of the years 711-713 by interpolating a first tenure of Eutychius, based on a misreading of the Liber pontificalis. Constantine ✍ 08:04, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Apparently I have to actually say delete or else my comments will be interpreted as a keep vote. Srnec (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Can anyone find a single reference of this personality in a reliable, discriminating source? Apparently not. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 02:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Quite frankly I have to say delete also. I don't see any references on this article until someone finds at least one and this isn't notable. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 03:31, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.