The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Erin Doogan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable blogger. The only independent coverage is local and semi-promotional. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG. -- irn (talk) 14:38, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:55, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:55, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. She has 46,000 subscribers on youtube so shes not unknown but isn't a household name, refs don't support notability. I can remember contributing to a vlogger debate like this who was subsequently deleted and now has 15 million subscribers, we can wait a while anyhow. Szzuk (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.