The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod partially restored via WP:REFUND. This is supposedly the less spammy version, but I don't care for this one either. The only sentence I see that might show notability were it well sourced is, "Essentia is the first company in the world to create an "All-Natural sleeping surface".[3]" which amazingly is both meaningless (all-natural is just a marketing term with no well-defined meaning) and obviously false (what did people sleep on before unnatural chemicals and plastics? straw? feathers? dirt?).
I searched Google, but was unable to find any reliable, independent coverage upon which to base a decent article. Kilopi (talk) 00:05, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]