The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\^talk 02:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eteach.com[edit]

Eteach.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Originally a vanity/advertising article, despite having notab tags applied since April 2007, its notablity still has not been proven. Nominated for deletion as originally inserted by company, and notablity guidelines Trident13 13:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, promotional material. Christiantroy 17:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:N and WP:SPAM. Bfigura ^(talk) 17:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 10:02, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete. Definitely a non-notable website. Keb25 11:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.