The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Twilight Frontier. Keeper | 76 14:43, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eternal Fighter Zero[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried searching for reliable sources that discussed this game, but came up short. A quick Google test doesn't bring up anything notable, aside from mainly fansites. So I think it should be deleted for not satisfying the criteria at WP:GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (video games). 十八 23:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) --十八 11:15, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. --十八 11:15, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Twilight Frontier. This looks awesome, but unfortunately we can't keep stuff based on awesomeness or we'd easily have at least another five million entries here on Wikipedia. Most of what I found was unusable fansites or blog mentions. This did get a few mentions in websites like Wired, but always in passing mention. There might be some foreign language sources, but this seems to have the same issue that a lot of doujin works have: since it's underground and unofficial, it tends to go unnoticed or uncommented upon by the mainstream sources for the most part.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:35, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lots of links to fansite wikis, but without any reliable third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage, this basically fails the general notability criteria at WP:GNG. --DAJF (talk) 05:31, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.