The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. WP:NOT#DIR. An overarching article might be possible, but these articles are just directory listings of shows. Black Kite 16:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

European Festivals 2003[edit]

This article is not notable. This is merely a listing of appearances by a band in Europe in 2003, put under an arbitrary name. I wouldn't say the same about Sick of the Studio '07 for example. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 14:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they have similar problems (ie arbitrary names; notability):

Delete there's no context outside of the infoboxes that even tell you what the table represents. I don't think it's a good re-direct because the name is vague but at best a merge to Metallica tours along with the other tours that don't establish notability (including the one referenced above, which at least has content). _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 18:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While my original delete stands, I think the others can be merged and re-directed to Metallica tours as they might be likely search terms. As of now, they have no context apart from infoboxes and are nothing more than tables. I think one article with a lead that explains metallca tours covers all adequately. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 15:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Singu larity 05:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - all the minor Metalica tours can be merged together, with section redirects. Few have enough notability themselves (maybe a couple have enough info to remain seperate), but all together might be a useful articleYobmod (talk) 11:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.