The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:13, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Larsson[edit]

Eva Larsson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was originally created by banned user Sander.v.Ginkel, recreated by a Slowking sock, recreated again by a SvG sock, and has now been "cleaned up" and reinstated. It has three sources. The first is worthless ([1]). The second does not mention her. The third is a directory. This article - every version of it, ever, pretty much, fails WP:NOTDIR. Subject-specific notability guidelines don't trump WP:V/WP:GNG/WP:NOT, especially for living people. Guy (help!) 23:41, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:51, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:51, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:51, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:51, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That seems like a perfectly sensible solution where players have no significant biographical sources, and I definitely suport it. Guy (help!) 09:37, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree, as then it would eventually just become a "list of..." type of article which isn't a positive for a club/national team article that is, obviously, about the team - not the player(s). R96Skinner (talk) 13:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, that's the worst possible solution. If they're not notable enough for their own articles, they're definitely not notable enough to have a short biography in the much more widely-read articles about the teams. That would require more, not less, notability than having one's own article. It's a reasonable solution for a sort-of-notable band with four members, but not for a football team. /Julle (talk) 19:39, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, does NFOOTBALL introduce an exception to GNG and BLP to allow articles with no substantive reliable independent sources? Guy (help!) 09:36, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.