The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.—Quarl(talk) 2007-03-04 01:55Z
I'm am nominating this for afd on the basis that it reads like blatent nonsense and vandalism and is likely a hoax. Shimaspawn 21:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Either a hoax or someone who draws unpublished comics; neither needs an article. —Celithemis 01:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and probably speedy (I almost spiked it right now, but this doesn't seem to be the week for that sort of thing). The subject artist would be 9 years old, and the article is the creator's only contribution, which is never a good sign in these situations. Newyorkbrad 04:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.