The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-25 08:19Z

Every sigh, the end[edit]

Moved from prod to AFD due to pleas from article's authors. The article is non-notable, unverifiable and also needs to be wikified. The author's requests to keep it are due to it 'gaining popularity' and a possible re-release. Unfortunately wikipedia only covers subjects that already meet notability criteria.--The Spith 15:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as spam. Book published by iUniverse (a "self-publishing" / print-on-demand company) and only link is to the book's Amazon page! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not notable. No WorldCat entries. Few online refs unrelated to book-selling sites. Addere 23:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete :: the in-article assertions of notability are not supported by sources and this fall to be queried. -- Simon Cursitor 12:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --pIrish 21:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable vanity publishing. I am also nominating the author's page for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason S. Hornsby. -Elmer Clark 07:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.