The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence Knowledge Exchange[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for 5 years; seems like a good organisation, but non-notable Boleyn (talk) 19:06, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 11:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 11:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 11:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article is about a non-profit organisation who hasn't received significant coverage in reliable sources, failing WP:ORG. Mentoz86 (talk) 12:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.