The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GRBerry (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evoma[edit]

I can't find any secondary sources for this company, and it seems like nobody has edited the page except for someone who probably owns/works for the company (they have done almost no other wiki editing), and the well-meaning editor who tagged the page for notability. It seems fairly well written and reasonably neutral, which is why I listed it here. Nonetheless, Delete. Gump Stump 21:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - stub article doesn't even assert notability. --- tqbf 21:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 09:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It sort of asserts notability (claiming it is a chain) then contradicts it saying there is one location with a second on the way. It looks like a simple pair of full service office buildings. I can't find any sources, but if they confirm what the article says they would only confirm that there's nothing special about them that needs an article.Wikidemo 10:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any internet-based sources that don't seem to have been generated by the self-promoting folks at this company (nothing wrong with self-promotion, just not right for Wikipedia). Not notable in North American terms, certainly (there are five or six of these buildings in Vancouver alone). And a note to the article's creator -- "chain" implies more than one link. Accounting4Taste 15:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete When it says "chain of business incubation centers", it means serviced offices. Fails WP:SPAM. ---- Gavin Collins (talk) 16:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --- FrankTobia (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.