- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 23:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- F.C. Magpies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No secondary coverage. Completely non-notable. PeterTheFourth (talk) 09:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Club has played in the national cup, which is generally deemed to make a club notable (see WP:FOOTYN). We have articles on all the other clubs playing in the second tier in Gibraltar (see Gibraltar Second Division). Number 57 10:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Number 57: Do note that that's an essay. Notability for organisations and companies is a guideline, and WP:VERIFY is a policy. There is absolutely zero secondary coverage about this non-notable team, and there is no such thing as inherited notability. PeterTheFourth (talk) 12:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm aware it's an essay, but it's also the result of multiple AfDs in which this was decided to be a reason for keeping articles on football clubs (see e.g. this, this, this, this etc; there are plenty more in the deletion archives if you want to check). Number 57 12:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, but Wikipedia policy is that we need some sort of source to write things about something. There are no simply no sources. PeterTheFourth (talk) 23:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As above, has played in the national cup competition Kivo (talk) 11:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As per users above and notability is there.700yuster (talk) 12:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep though needs expansion; per 57, the national cup competition should qualify it DarjeelingTea (talk) 19:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The national cup competition qualifies the page as notable. Needs improving not deleting. Kosack (talk) 10:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - with national cup appearances, clearly meets notability guidelines for clubs laid out in WP:FOOTYN. Nfitz (talk) 02:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.