The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FC Bemina[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable, no g/news hits. No reliable sources to verify with. Being used as spam by a user with an apparent COI. OSborn^arf_contribs. 18:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- OSborn^arf_contribs. 18:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- OSborn^arf_contribs. 18:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:FOOTYN.--Sodabottle (talk) 14:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable club, fails WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 13:48, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.