The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FISC EuroTour[edit]

The biggest problem with this article, with no significant contributors other than User:Fisceurotour and maybe an IP, is the promotional tone, such as "For its financing the foundation is totally dependent on membership fees and donations" in the lead section. Even if we wanted an article on this race, I think we'd have to start from scratch. - Dank (push to talk) 16:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, User:Fisceurotour has largely the same content, and it's tagged for speedy deletion. - Dank (push to talk) 17:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 16:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 16:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a non-notable tour that fails to satisfy the general notability guideline with significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. Esradekan Gibb ^"Klat" 09:27, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:N. Iowateen (talk) 02:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.