The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 12:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fabrice Valcin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Valcin fails WP:NFOOTBALL because he has never played for a team in a fully pro league. He fails WP:GNG due to a lack of sources. Dougal18 (talk) 09:39, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:06, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:06, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:06, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - article about amateur footballer who once scored two goals as his club, Bobigny, reached the 8th round of the Coupe de France for the first time. That Le Parisien article might qualify as non-routine coverage, but I don't see anything else that suggests the article could satisfy WP:GNG, e.g.,, he isn't even mentioned in Le Parisien's [1] report on the club's 8th round win or report or 0–3 loss in the 1/32-final. Jogurney (talk) 15:24, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.