The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fairfield University. Consensus to not keep, but not consensus to delete; redirection is a compromise that allows mergers if people want that. Sandstein 22:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fairfield University College of Arts and Sciences[edit]

Fairfield University College of Arts and Sciences (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources provided do not meet WP:GNG and notability is not inherited from the notable parent article. ElKevbo (talk) 01:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for deletion for the same reasons:

Fairfield University Dolan School of Business (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Fairfield University Graduate School of Education and Allied Professions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Fairfield University School of Engineering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Fairfield University Egan School of Nursing and Health Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
I'm amenable to that outcome. ElKevbo (talk) 02:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. History DMZ (HQ) (wire) 00:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is not in line with either our general notability guideline nor our common practices. You're welcome to open a discussion to propose a change to the guideline but I'm very skeptical that other editors would be supportive of us having articles about subjects for which there are few, if any, independent sources especially since there is already agreement that notability is not inherited. ElKevbo (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.