The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep(non-admin closure) The nominators concern that there are no sources has been addressed. No other arguments to delete. - Icewedge (talk) 05:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FaktorTel[edit]

FaktorTel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable. No sources or links to prove notability. Ernestvoice (talk) 16:40, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I added some references. --Eastmain (talk) 17:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 17:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 17:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Eastmain's references seem to establish that the company is a notable service provider RayAYang (talk) 18:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The publications Australian IT and The Age are notable enough for me.--Lester 04:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.