This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Fat cat if kept. -- Francs2000 | Talk 15:52, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fat cats[edit]

This is an article about a band that might be locally notable but don't appear to have released anything. The way that the article is written (and all produced in a single edit) makes it feel like a copyvio but I haven't been able to find the source(s) if it is.

This and the scatter of external links makes me think band vanity. Thryduulf 22:36, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete if notability is not established, Cleanup otherwise. Apparent data dump. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 22:43, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Copyvio noted source in copyvio notice on article page. -Harmil 23:04, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Fat cat —Wahoofive (talk) 23:30, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Fat cat. JamesBurns 04:32, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.