- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fayaz Ahmad Lone[edit]
- Fayaz Ahmad Lone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not entirely sure whether this needs to be deleted, but it appears to be a case of WP:TOOSOON: a scholar who is only an assistant professor and who appears to have just started publishing more widely. I haven't done a thorough search for sources, but a brief google scholar search reveals articles published only in the last two years, with the expectedly low (for such recent work) number of citations. – Uanfala 10:18, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 10:33, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 10:33, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 10:33, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Being an assistant prof at a minor regional institution does suggest WP:TOOSOON. A Google Scholar search returns few papers with low citation counts, and I can't find anything else that would pass WP:PROF or the WP:GNG. – Joe (talk) 11:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.