The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nominator withdrawal. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy5 (talk) 02:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Felix Fechenbach[edit]

Felix Fechenbach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:RS. If search for Felix Fechenbach+Nazi, google search shows only 45 ghits. This reference only mentions his name and this reference has only one sentence on Felix Fechenbach. No significant coverage multiple reliable sources. Fails WP:BIO. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Otelemer, I have to ask you, why do you search Felix Fechenbach+Nazi? Plus, just look at how many refs there are in the German version. This shows that this passes WP:BIO, and it just needs some TLC. I'll see what I can do. I'm an Editorofthewiki^{[citation needed]} 23:15, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - lots of book references if you do a Google Books search. 'Nazi' isn't necessarily the best addition to the search, it won't necessarily be mentioned close by in a source. Better to mention is party, 'SPD', or his birthdate, or where he died, each of which gets a good number of hits. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 23:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Appears to be notable and the article is referenced. One would not expect a lot of google hits. The references will be older paper ones. --Bduke (talk) 23:55, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep (for the record). Thanks guys for supporting this and adding to the article. I created a stub only, way back, due to lack of time.

Withdrawing nomination per the references provided. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 03:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.