The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 18:01, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Firewatch[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was initially marked with an A7 speedy deletion, but as the game is not going to be web only it technically fails that guideline. I did find some coverage, but not nearly enough to warrant an article at this point in time. I'm open to this getting userfied or moved to the draftspace, but right now it just seems like its just WP:TOOSOON for an entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:TOOSOON. reddogsix (talk) 05:34, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 19:42, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unti l it gets released. DGG ( talk ) 23:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.