- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. j⚛e deckertalk 17:02, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Fitoor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article provides no information regarding the principal photography of the film. It's a WP:TOOSOON case. Skr15081997 (talk) 09:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 20:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:INDAFD: Fitoor Abhishek Kapoor Siddharth Roy Kapur Katrina Kaif Aditya Roy Kapur
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 17:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - My personal view of WP:TOOSOON is in-line with Schmidt's. Not sure if the film as gone into principal shooting yet, but its coverage in reliable sources makes it pass WP:GNG in my eyes. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 22:44, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.