The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:02, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fitoor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article provides no information regarding the principal photography of the film. It's a WP:TOOSOON case. Skr15081997 (talk) 09:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nominated. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 20:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 20:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDAFD: Fitoor Abhishek Kapoor Siddharth Roy Kapur Katrina Kaif Aditya Roy Kapur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep and allow improvements to this article through regular editing. I wrote WP:TOOSOON and an adressable lack of content is a reason to add and improve such, not delete (See: WP:WIP, WP:IMPROVE, WP:SURMOUNTABLE and WP:UGLY]). Rather thana "delete", a possible redirect is a consideration for a very short while to director Abhishek Kapoor where policy and guideline instruct that this sourcable topic may be discussed. And not having begun filming is NOT a reason to delete a topic if notability per guideline can still be determined. We look at available sources and decide if coverage of production as instructed in WP:NFF (paragraph 3) is met. This one may be a very close call to some, but WP:GNG is our basis for notability ss supported by policy.India Today Mid-Day Times of India India Today India Glitz Bollywood Life DNA NDTV Bollywood Life DNA Thanks, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 17:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - My personal view of WP:TOOSOON is in-line with Schmidt's. Not sure if the film as gone into principal shooting yet, but its coverage in reliable sources makes it pass WP:GNG in my eyes. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 22:44, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep easily pass article criteria. Daan0001 (talk) 10:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.