The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I believe the subject fails WP:GNG as there's just not enough significant in depth coverage - out of 8 refs currently presented 2 are barely acceptable as they are from Forbes contributors, 1 (no7) doesn't mention the subject at all, 2 are about selling virtual vine (not about the subject himself), 2 about his partnerships. I have found this, but the source looks questionable to me. Generally there's more info about the vineyard rather than the person. Less Unless (talk) 21:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Noting the author's comment on the talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Forbes US Full interview | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Telegraph Interview | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Cosmopolitan | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Evening Standard | ? Article seems to be WP:PROMO especially with links to sites and prices | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Times UK | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Forbes US | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
L'Official | ![]() |
? Unsure about reliability of this French source | ![]() |
✘ No |
Decant | ![]() |
? Unsure about source's reliability | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using ((source assess table)). |