The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Florin Bejan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having never played a fully pro match, this footballer fails WP:ATHLETE. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 03:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete quite a few of these articles popping up for members of this team, it seems. I appreciate the enthusiasm of the editors writing the articles, but the articles themselves just don't meet Wikipedia standards. Try another wiki??--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:54, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understant., why deleted all Steaua II's players page??????????????? 188.25.235.19 (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steaua's reserve team is not fully professional. Therefore, all players who played only for Steaua II fail WP:ATHLETE. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:24, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments First, please refrain from personal attacks. Second, the reasons to delete are quite clear in my view, generally because they do not meet the standards set forth in Wikipedia policies and guidelines--and specifically for the reasons outlined above in this discussion--specifically that the subject material does not meet our standards of notability. You can read about that at WP:N, but bear in mind that notability is merely one of the standards to meet. If you disagree, you can make comments here and point out to us why you believe the subject material does meet those standards and an impartial third party will evaluate the discussion to determine consensus.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.