The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Undiscovered (Brooke Hogan album). (non-admin closure) →Στc. 01:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For a Moment[edit]

For a Moment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another song by Brooke Hogan which fails WP:NSONGS. Furthermore, it fails WP:N due to no reliable sources available. 11coolguy12 (talk) 09:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Didn't chart and wasn't particularly notable for any other reason. Didn't see much coverage. Gigs (talk) 13:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This song never charted or won any awards and coverage in reliable sources is almost completely lacking. Thus it completely fails WP:NSONGS. Cyrus Andiron 13:56, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not notable, not mentioned in RS. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Undiscovered (Brooke Hogan album), the song's parent album. As a single by a notable person, "For a Moment" is a reasonable search term, so I prefer a redirect over deletion. That's further supported by WP:NSONGS, which states that non-notable songs "should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song." The parent album is the most sensible target in this case.  Gongshow ^Talk 00:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Gongshow. Clearly fails NSONGS, but a redirect makes good sense. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 15:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.