The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Forlong the Fat[edit]

Forlong the Fat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A very minor character in LOTR. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:30, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Very minor character. Forlong doesn't seem to meet the notability criteria. Redirect to The Return of the King? Hog Farm (talk) 16:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This article makes no indication of its subject's importance. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 16:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I couldn't find anything GNG worthy in my WP:BEFORE -2pou (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: extremely minor, only mentioned briefly in the novel among a host of many in the Battle of the Pelennor Fields, but not mentioned in that article.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a non-notable character. There is no sourcing that shows notability outside of the source book (where he is in no way central to the plot).John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.