The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 00:54, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fraser Hobday[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NFOOTY NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - per WP:G4. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - certainly not notable, WP:TOOSOON at best. Being a non-admin, I have no way of knowing whether the content is similar to the previously deleted page. ~~I have tagged for WP:G4 in case it is largely identical.~~ — Jkudlick • t • c • s 22:44, 3 July 2016 (UTC) NeilN already contested G4 nom with "will explain" as edit summary. Eagerly awaiting explanation. 22:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jkudlick, I explained on the tagger's page: [1]. So, not eligible for a G4. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 10:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: Thank you. As I said, being a non-admin, I could not see the previous version of the article. I also consider that a substantial-enough difference to disqualify G4. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 22:36, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 07:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NFOOTY because subject hasn't played in a fully pro league, and even if he appears for Peterhead, which he hasn't, yet, they play in Scottish League One which isn't fully pro. The only media coverage appears to be the previous WP page thing, which probably doesn't count, although I wish I'd seen it :-) cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:35, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 07:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.