The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Freakyclown[edit]

Freakyclown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No verification of any of the claimed grounds for notability. Has been tagged requesting citations for > 6 months. Kevin McE (talk) 13:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as lacking notability. I can't find anything on this guy other than social networking and one other hit which is apparently copied from here. Mangoe (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete either made up or a vanity page W Nowicki (talk) 23:00, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• DELETE non-notable.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 21:19, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.