The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Young Frankenstein Waggers (talk) 08:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Frankenstein[edit]

Frederick Frankenstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

not important enough to have it's own page outside the central "young frankenstein" page. Ironholds (talk) 23:55, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Young Frankenstein. There's not much worth merging, and no claim of real world notability that would justify keeping the article. However, it could be a valid search term, so a redirect would be useful.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect Can't justify the seperate article which isn't explained within the parent article well enough already. treelo _talk 23:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.