The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 01:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FreeVMS[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fledgling hobby OS; notability not established. The mailing list carries some traffic and there are some blog posts about it here and there, but no reliable sources that I could find. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 23:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 23:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one of the web sites is dated from 1998, one 2009 and the other stops in 2010. Clearly any assertions about the future are not appropriate. Perhaps worth one sentence in the OpenVMS article with citations to the web sites for historical value. W Nowicki (talk) 16:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 20:32, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non notable software. A search did not turn up any reliable-source coverage of this software. Refs provided are not RS and do not establish notability.Dialectric (talk) 12:03, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.