The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Freight House (La Crosse, Wisconsin)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:BEFORE found no reliable sources other than Yelp and Tripadvisor JTZegers^Speak
_Aura 15:14, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:27, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, here's something. This provides some history for the building. And the NRHP nomination contains some significant coverage, as well. And there's this. Even more coverage out there as well; didn't list it all here. And it's on the NRHP. So Keep because this passes WP:GEOFEAT #1 and WP:GNG. Hog Farm _Talk 17:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Hog Farm's argument - meets our notability requirements for buildings and passes general notability Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep NRHP Djflem (talk) 18:17, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Any structure listed on the NRHP is deemed notable. I agree, the article is lacking in details, but it can easily be expanded. The NRHP documents offer a wealth of information, from my past experience in writing railway heritage articles. Oaktree b (talk) 19:49, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per NRHP. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 12:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per Hog Farm, passes obviously WP:GEOFEAT CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kep. On the NRHP. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: NRHP. CoatGuy (talk) 22:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Hog Farm. Its a former Milwaukee Road depot; the freight colors are right, but the Wisconsin history org got the name wrong. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul should be Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul and Pacific. Good work, Hog Farm. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Hog Farm - I don't think just being on the NRHP means a building is notable, but it does move things close to notable. The sources found easily get it over the line. SportingFlyer T·C 19:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Any individual building on the NRHP is notable per WP:GEOFEAT. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.