The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. SNOW... besides, a possible A1 as well Tone 22:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fruggleston[edit]

Unnotable neologism, deletion proposed per WP:MADEUP since no CSD criteria apply. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 10:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, clearly something made up one day. ∗ \ / (⁂) 11:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why not Speedy delete? Wouldn't it qualify under "nonsense"? One single google result (completely unrelated).-Running On Brains 11:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:CSD#Non-criteria, Neologisms. If not obviously ridiculous, new specialized terms should have a wider hearing. Obviously ridiculous is of course a matter of taste, but in the interest of not overdoing things, I figured AFD was the way to go. Go ahead and tag it for speedy if you feel it merits - you could perhaps even do so under WP:SNOW as there's no way this is not going to get deleted. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 11:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete In my view it could qualify as vandalism or a test page since it's the user's first edit. Since this is clearly a violation of WP:WINAD and WP:V I also see this snowballing in the near future. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G3: misinformation. -- Crowsnest (talk) 12:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.