The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fundamental Surprise[edit]

Google search 150 unique hits. No news The first link is to www.praxis brainchild of on Lanir, and the second link csel.eng.ohio-state.edu Emily S. Patterson October 8-12, 2001 refers to Lanir, Z. (1986). "Fundamental Surprise. Eugene, Oregon: Decision Research." Looking at the other contributions that the editors of this article are making, this appears to be advertising. Delete.
brenneman ^{L} 11:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Fails WP:OR. G1 is tempting, but no... Tevildo 12:20, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:NOR, borderline patent nonsense (but not quite). --Coredesat 13:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to Cognitive dissonance, which is roughly in the same area but is better developed. Ansell 00:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.