The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Magnolia677 (talk) 22:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Future (Future album)[edit]

Future (Future album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, either as is now or a redirect. The album is by a successful rapper and is almost certain to chart next week. Yes, we don't necessarily keep albums based on the notability of the artist or what the release may do, but being a successful rapper who releases an album through regular channels almost guarantees you some sort of chart placing these days, so I think this is a premature nomination. Besides, there is no real point in deletion when, with topics such as this, the page would just be recreated by an editor if it was deleted. As for redirects, they are cheap and keeping one pointing back to the rapper's page would aid readers. What the album needs now is third-party coverage, i.e. reviews. Ss112 22:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You redirected the article 3 days ago. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, why wanna delete the article, the album was released today. Just add more sources to it. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.