The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not assert notability, possible spam. --Daniel J. Leivick 02:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "according to their official website"? Needs better sourcing than that to survive. Non-notable, spam, and probably vanity as well. --Pigmantalk 05:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.