The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - lack of external sources so notability not demonstrated. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G-Kon[edit]

Contested prod. Gaming convention in Texas. Unclear notability. Sources are trivial. Delete. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 06:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only third-party source does not assert Notability. Boardgamegeek is a self-proclaimed "database" of board games, conventions, developers, et cetera, which calls in to question what they consider merit for inclusion. ZappyGun (talk to me)What I've done for Wikipedia 21:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't appear to be notable. Boardgamegeek is not considered a reliable source of research, and thus can't assert notability as per the general notability guideline. Randomran (talk) 21:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to verifiability and real world notability. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 21:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.